Doc 0000149620

.. n•.-:. Sr.t out below are a s•:ries ol' questions th:tl. nro:-3 frc•m .t.ime to tim,~: ! ...... :-··· as t,hc ~ark pr~cre~sed ami wP.re jntt..etl do;·JI1 ry t.hr; wri tt?r .;.s beinP,; oert.i.ncnt t..o Lhc oper:1tion and any suh5('qucnt activities Lh:'lt 111i~ht follow Lhe opcr;:t- tion. Thesr:! qu<:!stions are mr~r~ly .set.. do•m to as::; ist in Lhe !lnaly::;.i.s Q[ l..h':! /1"~~ nd worK and what had eon.c into the preparation of this trlp r~ (.··' .~ . . his' Assistant·. The notes were not ·.Nrit.tcn at one time, but over a nnmher . ... of day9 nnd are in no order ~haLsoever: 1. ~·Jn;:~ t., speci ficall.Y, ;:tre '' L11 11'3", and "·.J.'''? , ~cferred q·JiniT}~ B / \.::, a. to or cpini.ne ::;u\ptwt.t? - ~~· uzeri to 1'1::!.~:~ coff~e l'il,t.,r. Thi:; :;hrmld he che~ck<1d out to de l:.<~rlrti.n(~ .,.,hethcr nr not Lhis i;; a fact. • 2. ~hrtt wero th~ exact dosa~~s used and ho~ were they ~rrLvcJ at? ~-~ !." •• 3. 1f t.h~ rlo3.:tP;:e5 ·.-1er.:: not illiquid, whaL ·.oas l.he amount ol' t.he sterile wa l,r~r l.l3'~d'? • ·:lhy? .. ). 'tJhy were the rr~!paratinns so often us~d in cnJ'll'in<>.t,ion "lnl t.h~n av::d n only on~ <'l t, <J time'? In ::;hort., why co,L.Ldn 1 t.. t.hr.:!y hav'3 nll hecn used i..o•·:ethr~r? ~·· .,.... ' ~ . -. . . . (·, 7. \·Jhy w-1s no I.. ~.h'? i\rticr10ke 'i'e-1m hrit:'f~!d, p:lrL:i cu LarJ y in tr:!chnic:'i.l det;; i.l::;, of t.lw ert'!~r. ~.!; of Lb~ dru;:3 f"T'ior to . th~ir ll.'ie so th;\1, the Artie: hoke Te.qm COil Ld' hy or~·:;~-!·• @;· ti.on and moni.torim:,, ,iiJdr;e thn efrect,::;'? AHhour;ll ·Ll\ \o · s ta to:.!d the drur,s had !Jn ~uph'Jr ic ~r rec L ;111d h:td a en- ~ den~y tb m~d~ the suhjnct rel~x, tho Lerminolo~y WR5 so loose and f;eneral that judgin!! was impo~si~lH. a. Di~P.p St<ltistics on the student:> th:tt hP. l.,cst,nd'? If so, where are the dtatisticn, details? ~ B/c, 9. How many students wer~ actually used in the tests? ~•:;cd? a. To ;.rh.,t extent was To what. extent. dld- -~~;te personally? 10. ~hat conLrols ~ere us~d? Details. r II· 11. Were student'3 eJ/er cross-checkcu on polyr.ra1'h'? A 12. clur:!l"'d from the conferenct~ ~a:; :'!.sk0d in·: i~ dru~/chcmic~l at~;- 13. ito/ho man ~. a. What sort of a st~rr does he hav9? ' docs~Jo? b. 'Exactly whaL lh. 'IJhy Lhe drug/ch!::mical :specialist. The image is a dark background graphic. On the left side, there is a stylized illustration of a vault door with a circular dial and various mechanical components. The right side of the image features large, white, stylized text that reads "THE BLACK VAULT." Below this title, there is white text providing context about the document originating from The Black Vault, an online database of declassified government documents, specifically mentioning the MKULTRA/Mind Control Collection and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). At the bottom, a yellow URL is displayed: "http://mkultra.theblackvault.com". There are no photographs, handwritten annotations, signatures, official stamps, forms, diagrams, tables, redactions, or visual evidence of experimental procedures. The document is a typed page with handwritten annotations. At the top, "ROUGH DRAFT" is stamped, and a handwritten addition reads "A/B, 2, 33/16". Several sections of text are obscured by black redactions, with the largest redaction appearing in the first paragraph. Handwritten marks and notations are also present in the margins, including "H-B/6" and "B/6", and some are pointing towards specific text. The overall impression is of a draft document that has been reviewed and annotated, with certain information deliberately obscured. 10. ~hat conLrols ~ere us~d? Details. r II· 11. Were student'3 eJ/er cross-checkcu on polyr.ra1'h'? A 12. clur:!l"'d from the conferenct~ ~a:; :'!.sk0d in·: i~ dru~/chcmic~l at~;- 13. ito/ho man ~. a. What sort of a st~rr does he hav9? ' docs~Jo? b. 'Exactly whaL lh. 'IJhy Lhe drug/ch!::mical :specialist. instcau B/~ " of tests? " t/ e!J 4.>. check, investigation, ::tnd 1udi L ·~~~~he'~~ BIG .'\. th<~t. we sec the investi.f~-~1tion 0!1 16. '.-ihy did ~ · ShC'.-1 UO i~ 1)81-aih of tlli.'3 .:1r£'! ;:::. n9ce:Jsar,v ::;~n<.:e h~~r arriv:tl ~~.i~nt:. b~ a stronr; s·~curi.ty h;;z.1rcl. ( ~ .. t•, '. ( '-' ~ I . ( • , . t •I 't • ,.} ' ~ . 7 • ~ I i I • ,, ·- . ·-· I ' '. ·' / J 17. why were we told thatmllliiihad to be in the 9th ~ept~mber the~, of at yet in the ~-denied thls. 18. •,.Jhat is th•~ ~ "'" • ~ r •: ~ . J . ' ~ I, · t; ~ J , I· { . . . · .. . . ' • ,. .' ~J " l. ' , · •4 .. ' . ' . , ~ .,.. . . ( 1 ~ , .. I .... ,o,,ll .f.l t r ,- ~ . i . . . . .. . _ .. ,. . , ,,' , '" ~ . . .. ' . - .- ' - ' ~ ' '' . - . 0 " ' • 0 . . ', . ', . I . r . l, . l . , . ., . l . l• . ~ . • . . . ,. . . . . . jtf · ' • . : c · : t · t • • ~ ' . . ,' , •. . , . I , .. .. ' . #' . ' . · .. • .. I ~ • - ·: • · ·· Yo ~).";" · ,' : ! .. . . ' ' " i"• . '•. · · , t · : · "• t·•, ~ · 1 : • · • -/,,,' .• • ·• •.•, , , ·, · ••,',; .,,: .·.• II(, • .'. • . ,• ., · •, • , , . • . • t · •;J i"• . '•. · · , t · : · "• t·•, ~ · 1 : • · • -/,,,' .• • ·• •.•, , , ·, · ••,',; .,,: .·.• II(, • .'. • . ,• ., · •, • , , . • . • t · •;J . ~ · . .._ , ._ . •. t •, • : " • ~ - · - ·· •· · ·· •. . · .. · . .. . . . ~ .. ~ .. 0 . . • .. · . l&· • ,l· •..,... . t:. .. •"' . . a. \·Jh.1.t i~ari tal :; t.:d,u:> :llld is shc-r nrac Lid n~~ £> / ~ at being ~arried? 19. lf the drllt'" 11~od in the tests were standard, why weren't ••c told at 'once? 20. What :tre the effects of liquid :md food in comrction :..ri th the drugs? • a. Is t.hP. dru~ more or less effect.i.v~J befor~ or after ·.· • large quantitiAs of food or lar~c q1antitiAs of I \. , '. J. liquid, etc., etc.? . ,( ,. 'l ' .'.· \ 21. llhat are t.he effects of faUp;u~ on thn sul':-jr!~•.mncction with the drut~s? :3pecLfically, •11hy didn't,~tlo·.; the ~ to be used in:; te<ld of continua.Liy aski.n~ B 1 at h~ should try this time or. 5o and so :md such the·proper dose? )c;, ,.. - 4 •:ori_~_·:· ~. 22. Why was· a plcn;;:mt esscnti:1.L to 11':; · ha:i m::1d~ trip ~ fore to 3 tudy the :11 t.u·;;~ at first · nvc been •r~ll .;\w.-.r'J t.tnt most... nf the l4ork •,rould not te con:iuc~Jed in a plea5.:~ nt ;Jt~osollerr>. ,. . 2J. HoH can ~ny ::;ubst.'lnce3 be called surreptlJl~::; if a subj~ct r;ct:; ~··· drunk ~hen usin~ it? 24. ~as qu.lnine or a bte~r. sn_Pbs t.a nce actually ever .11:;ed? . (tl1eck thi3 with . "" ' Bt2s. If i,s in troulJlc su~~ d:i vorc·.=, hew ca.n i-le :;rnot.ltnr 13/3 th1s trip? i·Jhat would thl~do in the event of :). scandal or possible suicide? - -:tt on~lf i3/3 26. run an audit not. wh:r not.·:· .(3 ( l.a 27. ,ohviously kceo us <may from t3/ It:, ( on11r·~r J..•r ui t.h thi:.J 1:..£,cn~ I Coll:. . PJ.l t W i t,h .. • J B/~ ow h i.m or 'Joes tl!.~ ~-- -3- ..•. . . 29. tJcre '<~ r The image is a scanned document, likely a typed report, with handwritten annotations in blue ink. The text is primarily focused on numbered questions, some with sub-questions and handwritten answers. There are numerous redactions, obscuring specific names, locations, and details within the typed text. The handwritten annotations appear to be grades or marks, with instances of "B/6," "A," "F," and "H-B/3." The document is identified as "ROUGH DRAFT" at the top. an audit not. wh:r not.·:· .(3 ( l.a 27. ,ohviously kceo us <may from t3/ It:, ( on11r·~r J..•r ui t.h thi:.J 1:..£,cn~ I Coll:. . PJ.l t W i t,h .. • J B/~ ow h i.m or 'Joes tl!.~ ~-- -3- ..•. . . 29. tJcre '<~ r l ttcn t.P,3 t:; ever trind •.Hl l.t1 ~ :,ub .i~ r: i..:; ~ r~x pr:r .i M'~!l 1.. 1 lly .or •)lh"lrwisP., jn t,he u~;e of lht:":>':! dr\11~:;:' • ...... ;" )0. tJere psychiat-ric t..e:;ts evl:!r tri·~d .in t.hi:1 connr~ction'? 31. W:ts hypnonis ever used inconnect.ion with t.he::;e drflr;s7 If so, whcrt \o~erc t.hn result..s'? ;· J2. Ha!3 ~r us·~d hypnosi~; on~. (:..;o"Jeon,c !Jhould :1rran~>:'? very discr:?ct int.•.!r~~~ con ;t _nection with t~oject. on t,he 'ba~ns of' i.e:;t.imony asccrtainct.l i~=··~ ~ ") J. ~·Jh; did ,.....eave so suddenly? B / (p Ju. •-Jhr:~ t ·.ter"' the lar[!C:> t dosa~es ever g:i.ven ~xperiment,ally or otherwise 'i Fc!'mlt.s. JS.. Ho·o~ come these H:r.ot substances are called non-toxic'? ·dhy,did~!lJ' e,/lc J6. ~hat is Lhe antidote for each? sa:r there .'.· . was no antidote! '·~· t.al<•.m in on ~he fir::; t c.:ue l:y , mn ~rs, it, should he l\ st.:.;nd:trd ti1l.: . '-· -.< ,. ~~t. ~ny -~F.;·~nc::r ncrsonn(?l sho:tl.LI be bri.ef~d b:r l)llr o·,.;n people he fore he in~ nppronch~d by outsi'.lE'r:i, particul:u l:r in connection ·..rith experimental prO!:;ra.'lls.) 38. 'tJer<! thcr~ ever any ~ctua.l ch~nr.:e:J in th~ :;tori~s of th~ subj•~cts'? ·.~~re any ::::ir;nificant det:o. . \.ls prod•JC'~d·? ·,~ere th~re 01ny posi.t.ivn det.n.ils, .:JdlTlission-'5 or conf~s:.ion5 n•.1de, • etc., P.tc.? (In this conmct..ion, t.he .,riler feels th~t brief reports· by the case ·officers ·,rould rrobah.ly i'e of value in the c'\cccs:;mcnt of ti1 i3 type of researcl1.) )9. ~hile th~ writer was able only to ~hysically observe reaction~ • • in the fi.rst tW(l !'ase!; ~l!ld, in part, cover by •11onilorinr, thn last threr~ cases, the writer not..iced no autst:\ndinr. or c.l·~ar­ cut exampl~s of r~ooci feelin~ br~ing est::thli.!;lH~d on Li1e oart c-r the subj!~Ct or any real euphor in on the pnrt of the subject, etc. ;1 tlra·..rinr~ ljn0~1;'loy~ts) lto. i·Jo•J.ld oj.ct11rc;1 (along the rcvr..:~.l an:ythl.n~ Clefore and Rrt.er dosa1~r~·i'? .::!. -u- .,.,: . . .,; .,.;(o.~~:-:~!:0.:: ~:.,.,;~~·;;."::::-~--. ·c?:--; -~·: ~-;~"::.~:"": :...~.-~ ~-:;~;--~:':.:::-;,::;·,~~~~~:. ..· .. .,_~~:~~~-:...:.:_.-::-:-~·:.:-.::;:··~:·::.'i•~::·:~~• .. ,._~~:·:.:·.":'::;v ~ -...· . .' ~ ".. .._ : ;· :~-~-;..·. . ·: .........~ ::,-,; -·.·.•. • b. .-JP.rc the Porzf:'h:~ch This page appears to be a handwritten draft of a document, indicated by "ROUGH DRAFT" at the top and handwritten annotations. The content consists of numbered questions and some handwritten responses or grading (e.g., "B/6", "B/3"). Portions of the text are heavily redacted, particularly in questions 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, 27, and 28, making it impossible to discern specific details about the content of these questions or their answers. There are no images, organizational charts, or structured data visible, only text and handwritten marks. The document appears to be a typed questionnaire or report with handwritten annotations in blue and black ink. The page is heavily redacted in several places, obscuring specific names and details. Handwritten notations, such as "B/6", "B/3", and "A", are present in the margins next to various questions, likely indicating rating or classification by the reviewer. The document contains numbered questions pertaining to experimental procedures, drug use, and subjects' reactions, suggesting it's related to research or investigation. There are no photographs, diagrams, or official stamps visible on this particular page. ljn0~1;'loy~ts) lto. i·Jo•J.ld oj.ct11rc;1 (along the rcvr..:~.l an:ythl.n~ Clefore and Rrt.er dosa1~r~·i'? .::!. -u- .,.,: . . .,; .,.;(o.~~:-:~!:0.:: ~:.,.,;~~·;;."::::-~--. ·c?:--; -~·: ~-;~"::.~:"": :...~.-~ ~-:;~;--~:':.:::-;,::;·,~~~~~:. ..· .. .,_~~:~~~-:...:.:_.-::-:-~·:.:-.::;:··~:·::.'i•~::·:~~• .. ,._~~:·:.:·.":'::;v ~ -...· . .' ~ ".. .._ : ;· :~-~-;..·. . ·: .........~ ::,-,; -·.·.•. • b. .-JP.rc the Porzf:'h:~ch te::>t ev<'!r used ... hl. Ho·o~ co,Jld you possibly .1.d:nl.nistr!r thr.s~ dr11~:; ·,.~i t.ll 1. .-v,~ry ·, .._..- . tou~h ~nd very intelli~~nt individual, ~nrticulariy if he (. refnsed to have a drink of any q liquid -...rhile tn.lkin~; lofith ~.- you? u2.~n~ways tnD;ed Clbout SJ")P.Cia.l. siP.;nS anj indica ~ . rt~~ w , r t i h~ t d e he ~ n ot to ic ~ k a no b w l e j w u h s ~ t n w l h . . h a c t ,J d c r r u e r - ,s th 0 w . o 3 . e r e si t ~ a n k s i n~ t .h e a f t f ec 8 t.. J ~~w~_>ld /fa not.ice •rrl tlwt '"other individual . 'ft011ld not, or more spccifi~ally .a doc tor or a cot'\petent in- terrogate~ couldn't notice. ' •t··'.·--. u). Specifically wh3.l did these thlngs do that whisky, beer, vodt~<l, ~in w oulun' t.'! ·UU· Can it h~ said thnt in any wn.y f~xcept nce;at,iv·~, t.he t.~st wns SUCCP.S3ful? uS. If, after two years of rese-'lrch and hundreds of thou~3.nds of dollar:; spent and· t.h~ on .L~r su b:;tancn dcvl? loped :1.re s t.and.1.rd compounds such ~s the h;Jrhl turat,es, ,could we rn:J ke h~ n case of fraud? -, 1 u6. 1~;~ rni:;;tr'=S'5 OI' i:; h~vi.m: ~n <1ff~lr ~i\..h him or .l.S act.u~~ove •-lith hi.n or if t.hc rcver::;e b l;;r~Kl t.rur., how can tttlit it pos~lbly be ::t.nted thn.l. stw w·1uld be -~n imp~rtial observer? ,, L7. In the critical opinion of the writer, t.he snhst.,ncr~;,mdor no t-~ circ11ms tanc"!S sl'tould be ot• shoiJ Ld ha•1e been Lu rn~d ovn.r to • anyone overseas. They should have been do.~; troyed be fo · '= return i.n(j .to the U.S.. This should t-e checlc~d out ty the pro per people to see whether or not. this wa~ done • ... " The document is a typed page with handwritten annotations in blue ink. The typed content appears to be a series of questions or prompts, numbered 41 through 47, with some text at the top indicating "ROUGH DRAFT." There are several areas of heavy black redaction, obscuring portions of text within questions 42, 46, and at the bottom of the page. Handwritten numerical markings ("B/3", "B/6") are present in the right margin next to questions 41 and 42, and again near question 46. Another handwritten number "-5-" appears towards the bottom center. The overall appearance suggests a draft document with review notes. be fo · '= return i.n(j .to the U.S.. This should t-e checlc~d out ty the pro per people to see whether or not. this wa~ done • ... "