Doc 0000190497
CIA
This document, part of the CIA MKUltra mind-control program collection, outlines proposed projects and areas of immediate activity, including studies on individual amenability, interrogation techniques, and the role of instruments in eliciting information.
This is one record. The archive holds the rest — ask it anything across the MKUltra files and every answer is cited to the page.
Ask the archive about this →' . . . .. ~· .. ; . ~ .. · - ' . ,·;~~ ~, ' i,". 13;{ the Defee tor Center in "''• cribed a recent. contact wi.th rA .....~ , .. .. ' :~.; worked in collaboration wi.th nrn-:;;amRa,>;"'1-o5o-;r ~---::,...._ __.; ;... ~--<.. .~ c. -g t:; e or L & 1. ~u.ised th8 question i:1 talking aoout A t:·""• the suhstance. . of the project with professional friends. * . • : - ~ ~ ~, ~ ; ..:: ·• . ..: . ' f promised to develop one if desirable. . 2. tated he rrould like to establish an open list A of clearca so that he could have present at any meetinG only those with a sicnificant interest or contribution. >~ J. As phases of the proj cct mir;ht require the advice of hi;~ illy specialized perGons, consideration ;·ras given to tite possiuility of havinG certain conferences set. up on a one-ti.11c basis, (1.:;£'1" h. ac;reed to make the n0ccssary n.rranr;ements for A ~· -· the panel members to observe an interrogation nhen appropriate. ;;. !:o CO!'lplc tion datc.s for project ::;houlu be stated W1til the complete project ont..linc has been prepared. D. . SUGGES'.i'ED SPECIFIC Pil.OJECTS FOfl THE SUPPOi1T .STii.FF 1. Collection of substantive references for evaluation by the panel in tho delineation of areas of firm knovrledce. ''" 2. Proparation of a chart in ·which the situations likely to be ...--- faced by an ine li Yidual were plotted against the knovm defense. (Con eli tions L' >-· -~ !;)/ r '·· , · . to be specified by~-· · . · ~. . :l';.'l>~. u •. • E. SUGGESTED AH.EA.S OF D.U.IEDIATE ACTIVITY W"·~ ... ~- - l. A stud,·r of t,hc a.;Jcn.:tllili~y of tiJG indi,:.i.<.lual and the detection of u.n "amenable t:rpe." i~ 2. A t.horouch s Lud;,· of interror~ation. ~" J. An evalu<1Lioa of Llle part y;!Jicb insLrll:llent.s can pl."ln in 01.:ch a pro(;l"amo ~c F. COi~CLUSIOH 1. As the discussion ci.rel'r to a close, consid.eru. tion yras given · to the. degree o.f succes.J that could be at tainc'd:. ih tll respect to t!w - 2 -' ' .• .. · defensive aspect, tlw po.rwl c-':ln rmlcr r\<Jfinitn contriunt:ion if an ·1 .. improvement is ma.cle ifl. cxistins mctk•'i::: of resis tin;:; c..iisclosure. ~'lith ............. , respect to the offensive aspect of eliciting information, a stuci:/ of
The page itself is not a declassified document within the MKUltra collection but rather a digital representation or advertisement for "The Black Vault," a website that hosts declassified government documents. Visually, the page features an image of a vault door on the left side, rendered in a metallic, grey tone with blue lighting effects. The text on the right side, in white and yellow, explains that the document was obtained from "The Black Vault," an online database of declassified government documents, specifically mentioning the MKULTRA/Mind Control Collection. It provides a URL for accessing this collection. There are no photographs of people, locations, equipment, handwritten annotations, official stamps, forms, diagrams, tables, or redations on this particular page.
at tainc'd:. ih tll respect to t!w - 2 -' ' .• .. · defensive aspect, tlw po.rwl c-':ln rmlcr r\<Jfinitn contriunt:ion if an ·1 .. improvement is ma.cle ifl. cxistins mctk•'i::: of resis tin;:; c..iisclosure. ~'lith ............. , respect to the offensive aspect of eliciting information, a stuci:/ of \ .~ carefully selected areas of present information and properly de::;ibDed ... . research projects vrill enable us to develop better techniques. ·:~ ' ' • Ja.:,: .~', . ,,. ~ . A . 2. In conclusion, restated thl·ec qnestions v1hich . · . I~_,,. the panel vnll find use their discus~ion: ~~~ .•. ~ ~ ~ ·~ a. i','hat subject r.m\:.t.er requires further evaluation? ·~i; ~!! .., . b. i'n1o is the best man to evaluate present knowledge? .•" \... •. ·;:I . ' ... "·' .: . .' \ c. ~'lhat research projects vrill furnish us vrith needed informa tiont A- s t.J.tccl th.:1t he i'rould call a ::1cctint.; of the panel The meetinr; adjourned at 1630 hours. ' ........ - A .. · ··'· . : .·- ]. 1..' ~ '. - .. ~ .. .\._~ .-.., .· ·~.''. : ·.·. . • / - 3 -.
The image is a scanned document page with typed text and handwritten annotations. There are multiple black ink redactions obscuring portions of the text. Handwritten marginalia includes a "F", "C", "C, A", "B/3", "A" in several places, and a curved arrow pointing to "leave in". No photographs, forms, diagrams, schematics, charts, or visual evidence of experimental procedures are present. The page appears to be a report or memo with numbered and lettered sections, suggesting a structured format.
The page contains typed text from a declassified document, likely meeting minutes or a report, with handwritten annotations. There are several black redaction boxes obscuring portions of the text, primarily around names and specific details. Two instances of the letter "A" appear to be handwritten in the margins, possibly indicating a review or approval mark. There are no photographs, diagrams, stamps, or other visual elements besides the typed text, redactions, and marginalia.
Original source: view the released document