Doc 0000144661
CIA
This is a CIA memo from the Technical Branch to the Security Officer, dated February 16, 1953, reporting on an analysis of an "ARTICLE" concerning a dispute and techniques for obtaining information.
This is one record. The archive holds the rest — ask it anything across the MKUltra files and every answer is cited to the page.
Ask the archive about this →... , '• , TO: ~iccurit~r Officer DATE: 16 Fcbru.J.ry l?;;'J VIA: Dclmty :3ecnrit:r Officer vr.a.: Chi~f, S~cur.L t:; F.o:;cnrch St.:lf f, Itr.S II FRO!i: Chief, Tc chn ical Pranch, s:~s, r.:~~ SU"JECT: Re-::-ort on ARTIC~!Ol-:E by S11rr\n:-tr3' of, · f/ r.t<-.1.-cd 2 februa.ry 19~;3) I: }: } ' '. 1. 111c \·Tri t.~r hn:;· nade a vcr-.r carZ!ful stu•ly nnd nnaly:;i~ of the··· ~:::::;;;:::::::;:~ p. ,.... repo,.._t on l.hc An.TICI!OKE problem. In r;cncrl"ll, the urit.er ae:re~~ in t!1c overall :;tat.emen t-:; set out b:.r the f/ point r:-ut cert-ain elencnts in !.he dispute nmi lend to ind.Lcatc tliat J ' ~ ' tlC r:roup Fl-=l::i not, 1~ce:.1 to t. •: .lly (:1) The -- niqnc~,. etc. thnt vlill or at len3t ,1or-' 1 :1:;:::;i:;t in obt~inin~ in- fornation in Yit.:J.l case::;. Tho ut•iter hcl~.c~::.; .l. h~t im:ol·;~d, carrir.d on ~t ····- --·---· · irilL 11 •t h~ nroilncti'Tc (c::rt::-.i n1~: in i,hr. iPu~r:c~.i.nlc •• opt:raLlom; JH.:Ot-'lc uitcn it J..::i ucc:.lcd • .. , ' ·- - ·~~. .. , . . . ' ( 2) Th'c di::;c~l:..:i:3~:; th'' "100 cf-..~~i.O~!S Ch·':.'"Jlit:ot.,J . .J.~cn'...s. r·)...,._._ -/:. ... {:· .,~-... · c· . · ,._ r. · ~;hilc in n ~encral sense .i-6\accuraLe, iL doo::; not specifically .I •• ret to the core of the problem. The \-lr . i tcr Cl33~m·~s th::tt. tile t~·- :;rcrtp is fanili::lr >lith taost• or th~~ .t~chniqucs but .~ II it ls po~::;iblc th~t. . . ~ • ~1ar; nc_vcr crm:..::ifl.~rcd or pb~~;~-: I' . -~~_/---(.~.-) ....... 1<-· .. ·- l-,-/,,. .. ~ ........ _ 4'.··-'- ..-f).v<....- bly never heard of iit some.. . .T he i·rri tor 1·1 . t Li~·rc::; tha. t the ------ ~roup io loold.ng for :1 ••eapon '\..h:::lt -.-rill nnkc nn 1/ incli. •ridu:tl talk at great len!;th on pertinent r1n L t~rs 1-1i1ilc there is not.hinr: in their report to :i ndico.tc tha cxl:.rc:::::1e val119 of a chcr.U.cal nr.ent . ?-f it \·rill produce onl~,· on~ sraall bit. of' . ··"/ ( . v-crifi"abl'3 infoi1.1:1tion. ~.~~-' ·.:. ~~:;-~~-..:;:-}·\.cor;1J'1;~nt) that .lndivitlu:tls 'i·Then they l;oali7.~ thc:r <1r:~ drncccd tend to become tnc.iturn ·- is not accur:tCc. Indi'.;i.d•.tals mn7 1·-cco:.tc taciVn~n~ under c~r~nin cir~1~st~nccs if tim~r feel th~L Lh~y hn7e been r.l.~ t · ~ - ;ed or atLempteu to be drur...r.. ;ueri 3\lrrcpticiously, but . . ui'l!: .. of the -- esta1.:lishcd tecl:niqucs i::; to conceal the fa:t of the AlJ.'flCEOJ~S
The image is a website banner featuring a drawing of a vault door on the left, with blue light emanating from it. The text "THE BLACK VAULT" is prominently displayed in a stylized font at the top, over a dark background with blue accents. Below this, white text describes the document as being obtained from "The Black Vault," an online database of declassified government documents, specifically mentioning the MKULTRA/Mind Control Collection that houses over 20,000 pages declassified by the CIA. A bright yellow URL, "http://mkultra.theblackvault.com," is provided at the bottom for accessing the collection. There are no photographs, handwritten annotations, official stamps, forms, diagrams, tables, redactions, or visual evidence of experimental procedures present on this page.
This document appears to be a memo or report, marked with handwritten annotations in ink. These annotations include letters "H" and "C," as well as a horizontal line under certain words. There are lines of text, some of which are underlined, and some areas of text are obscured by what appear to be redactions or smudges. The document has a header with typed fields labeled "TO:", "VIA:", "FROM:", "SUBJECT:", and "DATE:". The date "16 February 1953" is visible in the header. Additionally, there is a handwritten notation in the top right corner. No photographs, diagrams, tables, or official stamps are immediately apparent.
tnc.iturn ·- is not accur:tCc. Indi'.;i.d•.tals mn7 1·-cco:.tc taciVn~n~ under c~r~nin cir~1~st~nccs if tim~r feel th~L Lh~y hn7e been r.l.~ t · ~ - ;ed or atLempteu to be drur...r.. ;ueri 3\lrrcpticiously, but . . ui'l!: .. of the -- esta1.:lishcd tecl:niqucs i::; to conceal the fa:t of the AlJ.'flCEOJ~S ·-. . llrur.:r;inG behim.l n titcdicr,l covr.r o.nd then '.ts·? duur~s ns a m~dical "? LL!/.:.j•·•••'·'·':") ..,·,.JL;;I~.,/ ._it. J~e .II• ~<j'lt~"r t.ren.tnv:.nL in ..:..~.ic oaseG. (3) discn:;scs the use of,, drup:,: hy1mo.:;i~ li p.nu bro:r.in .. dnnar:inr; nrocc;;scs .1.111 call:>. them cl2.horaLc, imhi·uctica:}. ,. ;J.Jld ,., ' ·,mn,~cc::;sary :ritho·Jt ·' it appears, r;oin~ :i.nLrr specific rc:-:.::;ons rcsulLs cunlct he ::'lccor.:pll:;he<l b:,r expert:; n::.;.i.w: ~; i.1aul':! l:.cchniqu•]:; of interror;.1.tion. The <rriLcr does not at,rcc ui th tr1i::; ~t :11l and .-can cite ins t ..: mcc.:; Hncrc nbsolu Lely ncH infort'"la tion iia:; turnwl up 1l3iD..;_; chemicals thnt ~.r::1s i.m;:,\T::~.ilablc before Ute· che:1ir.'lls '.·rere -2- , , . ,. ' , . !j L • J L , .. • ( 'I U!js:d ::tml Hh<Jro "r:-:n~rt.'' inLcrro;:'-l.Lor3 ·h:\d ,'J.~.lcrr.,IJ:-d to' ohLo..in (4) fi'/1-~"" ·· :' '' ·~.,. ap;.,~.rcntly S'lpports tho "tex:tbook t.hcory" that in- t1i vidual::; under h:rrno:-:is t·rill not ::~.ct a;::ain:-:t their Hill in re- .j 't.· c.-~.: pugn.:m t ac ts;t. '7.f violo nce .:1nd .;:~cts of dir;loy~t:f. Th.i::; i~ n vor7 r r. . , ~-~·""-. ;. '• •'"' _, \.. moot quos Lion :\lid the Hri L8r \-I .ish,·~ t.o ;_ ·~ '·,n 1;, (l'l'L t.,h~ L th~1·e ;, :~ < I I. ; ; ' \' . 1-_ . no tests Jllc."..de that co.n be"rq~arcled as·deflnati·rl;! in this matter • \·0· • -~.l..,.,- th·~ Thc wri ten~.., wishes to point out that e.:..:pcrt:3 in fiuld _of , :./. , ' . /, " .. r'"J . ~ / • '.ol • ) , ' •• : ..._ , I' ._, hyrmos is arc not ::1groed on thi:; point nml \~r..l_ o_l !'H"of.eBso~ml nob-rloe-tors feel tha L thc:n'! is a. good ch::mc<J t.hn L Lh9sc th.in;~s can he accomplish~d th.rour:h hypnosi:; • · . ( 5) . T he ?;roup C:)rtr.'lent~; on Jnctho<.h l)f com~:J.L . i n.~ .t.n-c -., ~ l. • • . - .,.·./J.Jt... ·,, t· l- ···I t':chn:i.quq/ :1nd their r~co;'J:.tcndations in r:encraJ. .:).!1!JCal / : 1 to the ·· ·· . . tiiesc recorr111endations 'ttould tal·:e a. ~re~.t d".)al or t.iinc, no'r~c·y,
This page is a typed document with handwritten annotations. Redactions are present but do not obscure significant content. One prominent handwritten annotation in the lower left corner appears to be a stylized "All it". A small handwritten question mark is present next to a numbered point on the left margin. The text discusses chemical agents, interrogation techniques, and is marked with official stamps, though they are mostly obscured. There are no photographs, diagrams, or forms visible on this page.
T he ?;roup C:)rtr.'lent~; on Jnctho<.h l)f com~:J.L . i n.~ .t.n-c -., ~ l. • • . - .,.·./J.Jt... ·,, t· l- ···I t':chn:i.quq/ :1nd their r~co;'J:.tcndations in r:encraJ. .:).!1!JCal / : 1 to the ·· ·· . . tiiesc recorr111endations 'ttould tal·:e a. ~re~.t d".)al or t.iinc, no'r~c·y, and -- effort b8Core ar!y;t,hint; ·uefinati,re coulcl come of it. (6) 111a.tle in p:;ycholoi";ica.l :off cc t~, human bch:wior, :; Ludic~ of ~e- duction, persuasion, ~nd persistr:mqe. arc. 11miouhtcdly, l·Jorthy progccts but HoHld be time con:31u1'1inr.; and rc:.;,llt:; ~c~1ld not, ·he ,. .... forthc.or.U.nr:.. for cr.Lr~l-l"~l:r lonF~ period:; of tlm~J. P.EC'Jl ii l~iJD,\TIOI!S . ·/ . '· ;, 2. Tiwt i~ \·rhct~ the ; :,roup ever nt':!et.s as a unit t.hat • A'~.TICJIOKE Teart members be p~nnitted to tall~ personally to th.e ~ .., . .... ....,_.a_ ... ';ot_;ss:-~ "'1'';·- r,roup l"tember!3 and lay he fore them specific examples and certaj_n i te:Tls, \lhir.h 1 t·z.. .. /~. ..• .£,.,..,.. /~ ...~ ..--r.,-A . , , mcmbcrs can r,iYc pertincnt r1.dvicc. The urit.cr .. .,.,_ -J- . . ..... ..,.-.'.".· - ~ ~ . ,._.r..~ 4 . • : • . : ,t - .' ~ . . . • . . . • .. • .. .. , , .,\ . • - "'~ .. • . . ~ . · . ~ •.•~,... ' J••:'.-·". .'.;...o.- ~• : " . '- : • _ . ·: · . ~ ._ .•. ..•..•..•.. ._ .,;.. ..."..'. • .. .: .• ~ . . - . . :* - , ~ , ,· . , · ·· • .....· :_•-:_ • " • ' •.. ._ : ,:. - ~ . ~ .. r . o . -. • - ~--_ . -~ - :. . ._....... ....• . -- ..··.. -_ - :. ._. _·.-..• .. '·-~ , · ... . ·.-.· .. ·.. ·_ . · - -_. .• ~ ---~ . ; ..... ~ . .. =----···.~',.._-::~ -,t.- .'" -........ . ; .....• . •... .....-........- .... .. ..... ... • 'I' ... "'· .~. . ·-------------------·- . . · • ~ · ·· . ,. · : . . : , ... ~ . . . ' \ \ . · . ... •~ . ,) , , ./c 1}. ,,,.;.:;...,...~ ~'::.. .._ \... ""'. .. .,...; .. .. 2 . , · ' l'~h c._f.
This document appears to be a typed report with handwritten annotations. There are several instances of crossed-out text and underlined phrases, suggesting revisions or emphasis. Some text is obscured by handwritten notes, and there are also handwritten annotations in the margins. The document contains numbered sections and bullet points, indicating a structured report format. The presence of handwritten comments indicates active processing or review of the document.
. . · • ~ · ·· . ,. · : . . : , ... ~ . . . ' \ \ . · . ... •~ . ,) , , ./c 1}. ,,,.;.:;...,...~ ~'::.. .._ \... ""'. .. .,...; .. .. 2 . , · ' l'~h c._f. .. { 7 ~ •.:. '.· . . .. / , " " ' feels that the I. ttroup has never been thoroughly br~c!ed or • .I in . docrinated in ARTICIIOKE~A:-lD THAT · . tneir report quite clearl . y. · r. .e. f : lec. . t . · 1 . i . that.' · .. ·. · ). The l-Tritcr caru1ot agree with the =====~j. opinion that "littl~; .. ;::i ' . . . ' . . threat., if CUT'/, to U~tiona1 Security exists becaus'e or· special interroga~i~n it : .. techniques or agents." The writer uishes. to point out ·~l'l~li iilut ortiy tJf SUCCCSSf~l t~.· requires one brea.ic for the COl-:tpromising il'l9 individllal .. caase . . . extreme damage to a nation. Tnere ar~. numerous recent classic exampl~s of this • . ... · ~ :. - ~ 'j : .~:. : . ·; . ._ :. :· ' ,.',\I . \ ~. . ., •~ : iJ .. '(,f . .. ·, . ·,.) '• ) ..... . . •: ... . ~ · . r~.~ ---. ·-'"~--.. . I. -- - . ··- ' .., ". ~-~-- '• - ~ ' ,; : ·;: \.·' '' .. .· •.· '. ..... :I j~~-,~.1 ~: I';, .!"., _.::.iS. J. ".· l. , . .. [ \~ . ... . -.. ·:: . ' • I~• . ~-I ··. " '~ \ ' .. , ' . . . ,;'(. •. • j .'- r-- .- ,;.:_..,- / .. • , , ...... ! .. .. . , , '
The document is a single page of typed text with significant handwritten annotations. The typed text discusses the writer's disagreement with an opinion regarding national security and special interrogation techniques. Handwritten notes appear in the margins and between lines, elaborating on points, adding comments, and listing numbered items. Notably, there are several blacked-out redactions, predominantly in the form of rectangles, obscuring specific words or phrases within the typed text. There is also some handwritten cursive at the top right of the page. No photographs, official stamps, diagrams, or forms are visible.
Original source: view the released document